Monthly Archive for February, 2011

Reading Shakespeare: Antony and Cleopatra

Continuing in my “Reading Shakespeare” series, where I endeavor to read through any Shakespeare work I’m not familiar with, I spent the last few days digesting “Antony and Cleopatra.” Let’s do it to it.

Antony and Cleopatra

Summary: A sequel of sorts to “Julius Caesar”—except not really—”Antony and Cleopatra” is the tragic tale of the power struggles that led to the historic Battle of Actium, where Octavian, later known as Augustus, famously squared off against our titular protagonists.

-Another winner for Shakespeare. “Antony and Cleopatra” is a page-turner full of intrigue, heartbreak, comedy, and rich characters. This is a massive, sprawling epic that captures the same sense of intrigue that “Caesar” pulled off, and then adds a malevolent, soap opera grandiosity.

It’s the best kind of tragedy: a gigantic one. Nothing is held back, the Bard swings for the fences here. “Julius Caesar” had a murder here and there, a couple land battles, and a couple of suicides at the end. AC (my shorthand for the play) almost doubles the number of murders and suicides, and ups the ante to sea battles instead of land. I don’t know if it’s “better” than “Caesar,” but it is more fun.

-My favorite scene transpires in Act II, Scene IV. An unfortunate messenger is tasked with telling Cleopatra that Antony has married Octavian’s sister while away in Rome, and so begins one of the purported origins of the expression “don’t kill/shoot the messenger.”

Now yes, I am updating this dialog. But the crazy thing is, not that much. The rhythm of the scene is incredibly modern, and while I’m going to change around the words, I’m not even touching the basic intent of each line. Get ready for this: (M is the Messenger, C is…well come on, you can figure it out)

So in walks the Messenger, and he knows he’s got to tell Cleo what happened, but he isn’t sure how. Cleo, meanwhile, has no idea this is coming, and is worried primarily about how things went in the negotiations between Octavian and her man:

M: Uh…hey.

C: Hey! You! What’s the word about Mark Antony? You look like a nice dude. Tell me everything is okay. I’ll seriously give you ten dollars if you say Antony’s okay.

M: Uh, he’s fine.

C: Yes! Yes! He’s fine! You are the MAN! I love you! You better not be lying, though. You better not be jerking me around. Are you jerking me around? Cause I’ll pour boiling metal down your throat in, like, two seconds if I find out you’re full of crap. We have a guy for that. That’s all he does.

M: Just hang on, I need to say something here.

C: I’m gonna murder you. I’m gonna seriously have you executed if you don’t shut up. You look like a mean person. You look like a person who says mean things.

M: Can I just say something here?

C: “Can I just say something here?” That’s what you sound like. Fine, whatever, say something. I hate you. I wish your mother was dead. Is Antony okay, though? Are things cool with Caesar? Look, I’m sorry about that thing about your mother, she sounds like a lovely person. Just say things are cool with Caesar…Say it! I’m gonna eat your soul for breakfast, I swear to the gods.

M: He’s totally fine, and things are cool with Caesar.

C: You and I are best friends. Let’s hang out later. You’re awesome. So everything went okay?

M: Well yeah, but…

C: “But?” Yeah I don’t like that even a little bit. Maybe you should just quit while you’re ahead. Can someone get the boiling metal guy on standby?

M: Look, he’s married, okay? He’s married to Octavia.

I imagine there’s a pause here.

C: (clears throat) Married, like, how?

M: Like…uh…they sleep in the same bed.

C: I don’t understand.

M: Um…they’ve had sex?

C: …I can’t breathe. I’m turning pale.

M: So anyway, yeah, Antony is married. I’ll just show myself out–

C: –I WANT YOU TO DIE!

Cleopatra then starts pistol-whipping this guy. I mean, she doesn’t have a gun obviously, but you know what I mean. She goes nuts on him.

C: TAKE IT BACK!

M: Ow! Ow!

C: TAKE IT BACK!

M: I can’t take it back, it happened!

C: Okay I’m not going to hit you again. But seriously, you should stop lying right now.

M: I’m not lyi–

She hits him.

M: Ow!

C: –Say that isn’t true and I’ll give you a really big house with a ton of slaves and I’m not kidding. Here’s the deed, I’m ready to sign it. Just tell me you were joshing me. Pullin’ one over on ol’ Queen of the Nile. Ha ha, very funny. Ya got me! Whew! Good one.

M: Uh…Antony is married to Octavia.

C: No he isn’t.

M: Yes he is.

C: Nope.

M: Uh…yes?

C: I was kidding before. I really am going to kill you now.

At this point, she pulls out a knife, and makes with the stabbing. The messenger survives by blind luck and runs for his freaking life. Cleopatra then claims she is all chilled out (“I’m cool, I’m cool!”), and invites him back. He returns, only to irk her ire again, so he runs away again. When he is finally brought back for a third time, it’s a later scene in Act III:

M: …Hello.

C: Yeah hi, listen, about last time…I mean, what can I say? I was out of line.

M:…It’s cool…

C: Anyway. I’m glad we’re past that. Now about this Octavia slut.

M: …Yes…?

And then, I kid you not, this is how great Shakespeare is, Cleopatra asks the following question (in slightly different words…but not as different as you’d think):

C: Is she hotter than me?

M: No.

C: Really?

M: Really. You’re way hotter.

C: Is she tall?

M: She’s totally short.

C: Yes! Yes! I knew it. What color hair does she have?

M: It’s like, brown.

C: Is it a pretty brown?

M: What? Noooo, of course not. It’s all…stringy.

C: He hates brunettes. He told me once. He’ll get sick of her, I know he will. Thin face or round?

M: Oh, round. Round as hell. She’s a fatty.

C: Ha! I’ll bet she is. She sounds fat. Octavia. What is she, an octagon? Hahahahaha!

Picture, like, the craziest laugh you can imagine right there.

M: …Ha…Ha Ha…Well, it’s  late…

C: Yeah sure, get out of here.

The messenger leaves, and permanently deletes “Egypt” from his GPS.

C: (to her handmaidens) Nice guy, I like that guy.

Like I said: I altered that, but not as much as you might assume. The basic rhythm and tone of the scene is completely intact. I think it’s one of the best, funniest, and most vibrant pieces of tragicomedy I’ve ever read.


-Our good friend Antony is back, and ever remains the perennial douche bag. Billy made a good point to me the other day: he’s not really a politician, he’s a rock star. His indulgent, neglectful, downward spiral behavior is not only compelling drama, it’s modern. By the play’s end, his behavior has gone from De Galle with a hangover to full-on Lindsay Lohan. He writes his own doom, and could have easily avoided it.

As the play opens, he is departing for Rome to deal with Sextus Pompey, a dangerous pirate whose attacks on the empire require the attention of all three members of the Triumvirate. Playing into the classic form of “hos in different area codes,” Antony tells Cleo to chill, girl, you know you is the only woman for me, then promptly marries Octavian’s sister.

I mean in fairness to him, wedding Octavia is the smartest thing he does in this play, and it’s all downhill from there. His mistake is going back to Egypt at all, and leaving a scheming, manipulative mini-Caesar was a massive inferiority complex tottering around the capital city by himself. He’s like, “Wow, my political rival is seriously cunning, I’d better keep an eye on him. On the other hand, these far-East desert hussies aren’t gonna bang themselves, so I’m out of here.”

From there, the mistakes roll in with the tide: everyone tells him to fight Octavian on land, but Antony refuses and makes it a sea battle, because—and I’m not kidding here—Octavian triple-dog-dared him. After their inevitable double-whammy defeat, which every human being within a hundred miles told him would happen, Antony gets word that Cleopatra has killed herself. Now rather than go see with his own eyes like a person with a brain, Antony decides to kill himself as well. And why? Because he can’t go on without her? No. Out of sheer competitiveness. She killed herself, and now he looks like a punk, so he’s got to kill himself.

So, he hands his sword to his buddy Eros and says, “Make it happen!” And then Shakespeare performs one of the most delicious turns of events I’ve yet encountered. Eros winds up for the kill, but can’t bring himself to do it, so he kills himself instead. And now, in another genius burst of tragicomedy, Antony turns around, sees Eros lying dead, and says, “Damn it! Now they’ve both outdone me!” So he jumps on his own sword, but by now we’ve established that Antony fails at everything, and his wound leaves him alive and miserable.

But it just keeps getting better. Cleopatra sends word that she isn’t dead, but had sent word that she was to make Antony stop blaming her for their losses. Now that’s a psychotic thing to do by any measure, and by doing it Cleo single-handedly enters the pantheon of all-time nutcase girlfriends, but that’s not the point. The point is, now we discover the reason that most people verify things with their eyes before making life-or-death decisions based on second-hand information. Antony, on the verge of death, is brought to see Cleopatra, who somehow resists punching him in his stupid moron face. He dies, and ends a long stream of cowardice and idiocy that it took Shakespeare two whole plays to fully describe. Goodnight, sweet prince. Sniffle. He’s up there blaming angels for his incompetence now.

-Cleopatra, despite my evisceration of her sanity in the dialog above, is the most interesting character here. Critics have long debated, for lack of a better way to put it, “her angle” in all of this. Does she really love Antony as madly as she claims? There are several instances in the play where Antony’s moronic escapades drive her to feel out other political options; she’s even receptive to Octavian after Antony’s death, until she gets wind that he plans to parade her around Rome as a trophy of war. And Shakespeare doesn’t let us forget that she pulled this same song and dance on Caesar, and a few characters ponder aloud how sincere she is. She reacts viciously against this, in much the same way Mark Wahlberg reacts when you call him “Marky Mark.”

Others could argue that her undying, unyielding love is totally genuine, and certainly there are ample tirades and lovesick monologues to back that assertion. She’s insane with jealousy all the time, takes his reproaches way too personally, and seems helpless to contain his bull-headed will. The question, therefore, is “Which is it?” Is she a lovesick queen who seals her doom with her heart, or a savvy political manipulator who loses a hard-fought game of diplomatic chess?

Both, I think.

I don’t think it’s possible to deny she is enchanted by Antony: he’s a handsome soldier with brutish strength, and a hot-headed jerk who needs “fixing.” He plays to her maternal instincts and her basic lust. So yeah, she loved the guy, but that doesn’t mean she wasn’t also working him over. Her temper tantrums, of which there are many, were all calculated to achieve control of his behavior, a fact she freely admits in the beginning of the play. And she’s constantly on him to play smarter against Octavian, keep up better appearances with the men, etc. She’s trying to make this guy a winner by any and all means necessary, because he is her only meal ticket into Rome.

Although Cleo is soundly beaten, I’m not sure how much I can fairly chastise her. She lost, no doubt, but she played the game about as well as her situation would allow. It’s just bad luck that her only in-road to the Empire was a drunken idiot. Of course, the prudent thing to do would have been to desert Antony, but A) I can understand why she’d never do that, and B) there’s no way she could have truly known it was a good idea.

-So anyway, there’s lots of great stuff here. My criticisms of Antony’s behavior should not come off as marks against Shakespeare: I love how boneheaded the character is, it makes for awesome, page-turning tragicomedy. And Cleopatra is a fascinating black box of a character. She’s an intelligent woman who is stupidly in love, and the reader must puzzle out where one ends and the other begins. Which of her actions were for desire, and which were political? You can never know for certain. Such complexity and depth is what makes Shakespeare last as long as he has.

-Quick side note: Sextus Pompey, the dread pirate out to get Rome for killing his father, is an awesome character. Although only a minor role, he has a shining dramatic moment during a scene where he invites Antony, Lepidus (the other member of the Triumvirate) and Octavian onto his barge for peace talks. While at sea, one of Pompey’s men pulls him aside and says, “Dude, we’ve got them. All three rulers of the known world. Let’s kill them!”

Pompey’s response is amazing: he seems to smile sadly, and with a sigh tells his comrade, “Why the hell didn’t you just do it without my permission? Now I have to forbid you, for the sake of my honor. Damn it, dude.” The portrait of a man cunning enough to wish for an unscrupulous rise to power, but too decent to actually enact it, is brilliant. That right there is why Shakespeare lives forever.

RATING: 10 out of 10

Reading Shakespeare

As a writer, there are basically two resources I always want to pull from: Hitchcock and Shakespeare. The former, in my view, forged the language of modern thriller cinema, and I spent all of last semester deconstructing his work under the masterful tutelage of Dr. Drew Casper. Suffice to say, I feel pretty good about my Hitchcock expertise. You want to know about “Psycho”? I’ll tell you about “Psycho.” And don’t even get me started on “Notorious,” “Rear Window,” “The Man Who Knew Too Much (the later remake),” and so forth.

And yet, Shakespeare is painfully absent from my knowledge base. I’m only strong on “Much Ado About Nothing,” “Macbeth,” “Richard III,” and “Romeo and Juliet,” and that last one barely counts. More than that, though, I’ve never really understood the depths of what his work means. When it comes to Hitchcock, I can tell you all about his obsessions: cosmic indifference, doppelganger, the dark night of the soul, and moral cynicism. Shakespeare is a different story. I can feel that this guy’s work matters, but I want more than that. I want to personally connect to the themes. I want to know this stuff.

So, I’m going to read Shakespeare’s plays. As many of them as I can, that I haven’t read before. I’ll watch a performance of them, as well, if I can. And I thought you’d appreciate coming along for the ride. So let’s begin!

First up is…

Julius Caesar.

Summary: “Julius Caesar” is the story of Caesar’s assassination and the political and military fallout resulting from it. Its principals are Caesar, Brutus, Cassius, Mark Antony, and Octavian.

-Overall, I adored this thing. It flew by. The first three acts are like a great Hitchcockian thriller, wrapped up by a tragic war film. Also, do you realize how many timeless lines come from this thing? “Et tu, Brute?” “Friends, Romans, Countrymen!” “Beware the ides of March,” “The fault lies not in our stars, but in ourselves,” “The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones.” And in case you doubt that last one, I just heard Eminem quote it in “Cold Wind Blows,” off of his most recent album. For any one work of fiction to achieve that much recognition hundreds of years later is a miracle. Only Shakespeare could pull this kind of thing off.

-Curiously for a play called “Julius Caesar,” Julius Caesar is not the protagonist. Some debate this, but in my opinion there can be no question about it. Caesar is only in a handful of scenes, and he’s offed in the third act (note: Shakespeare works on the five act structure). The guy who gets more stage time—and the one with the real conflict—is Brutus, Caesar’s most famous assassin.

Brutus is a great character, one that strikes me almost immediately. The basics of his conflict are heart-rending: the love of his friend comes directly at odds with his patriotism and belief in republic. Brutus has gotten, shall we say, a poor shake from the annals of history; Dante consigned him to the lowest possible level of Hell in the “Inferno,” and placed him—I kid you not— inside Satan’s mouth. More on that later.

-A key theme here is the distinction between the same act perpetrated for different reasons. Cassius, who sort of represents the rest of the conspirators, is a jealous douche bag, and his motives for the assassination are suspect as hell. When pressed by Brutus early in the play, Cassius launches off on some song and dance about how he saved Caesar’s life once, and that proves he isn’t so tough, and blah blah blah. Brutus dumb-foundedly ignores him, almost blown away by the ridiculousness of what he’s saying. Shakespeare is making a deft point here: Brutus and Cassius both killed Caesar, but only one of them murdered him.

-And then there’s Mark Antony, who could not receive a worse treatment. He’s depicted (I think) as sniveling, manipulative, and almost cowardly. When Caesar is first killed, Antony is supplicant to the assassins to the point of discomfort; you can almost hear Brutus furrowing his brow and saying, “No, seriously, we’re cool.” Then, quite conveniently, when Brutus leaves him to handle an angry mob, Antony spins on his heels and drops the famous “Friends, Romans, Countrymen” speech, rallying the people to avenge Caesar’s memory. Antony would have you believe the sight of Caesar’s body just overwhelmed him and he couldn’t help himself. I say he’s full of crap, and he was planning a reversal all along.

His monologue, I feel, is wrongly commemorated as a great moment of stirring oration. It’s great writing, no doubt, but there’s nothing classically noble about it. As I read the thing, I wretched back in disgust, especially when contrasted with Brutus’ speech to the mob that preceded it. Brutus appealed with reason, and asked the people to digest an uncomfortable, unpleasant truth that was necessary for the betterment of all (I’m paraphrasing and colloquial-izing here):

“He was a great man, and no one loved him more than I, but we can’t let anyone rob us of our freedom. Sometimes our personal feelings must come second.”

Antony screams rhetoric, pressing nostalgia wrapped in guilt-tripping nonsense:

“Caesar…remember how nice he was? Remember that time he was a cool dude? He always thanked the janitor for doing a nice job. One time he rescued a puppy from a burning building. It seriously happened. Now he’s dead. He’s DEAD, damn it!”

It’s a moment of utter falsehood, a callow brigand’s clever little self-serving ploy. There’s more Richard III than Henry V in Mark Antony, I think.

But more than anything else we’ve considered here, I think there’s one lingering issue in this work…

-How does Shakespeare, the man, really feel about Caesar’s assassination? It’s hard for us to appreciate this now, but Caesar’s death was a sore subject, especially in Italy, for hundreds of years. Dante saw it as the act that permanently destabilized Italy’s government, and led to decade after decade of infighting and eventually the decline of the Roman empire. I would argue that these things happened in spite of Brutus’ attempt to stop them, but I digress.

I think Shakespeare found himself in league with Brutus. That he is portrayed as noble and self-sacrificing is inarguable, so at least the Bard was sympathetic to his protagonist’s dilemma. True, the play is vague in addressing how sound his reasoning was in killing his friend, and you could argue Brutus made an irretrievably rash decision. If you treat him as a guy who got tricked by jealous schemers—an Othello of sorts—then the assassination was a horrid blunder made for the right reasons. That is certainly dramatically satisfying enough.

But I don’t agree with this interpretation. I think Shakespeare saw Caesar’s death as a necessary evil, and in writing “Julius Caesar,” he sought to examine the terrible weight that statesmen take on themselves when they dive in front of harm’s way to protect their people. In striking down his best friend, Brutus attempted to safeguard the Roman people from tyranny. He failed, and this is why Octavian exists in the play: to remind us that Caesars are like weeds. Nonetheless, I think it’s nonsense to suggest that Brutus’ fears were incorrect, or that his decision was rash. He killed Julius because he was afraid the man wanted to rule Rome, and he was right.

Unfortunately, and this may be the crux of the play, being right can’t always save you.

RATING: 10 out of 10