Monthly Archive for July, 2008

Tennessee in Summer

Hello there from lovely Knoxville TN, where myself and Cor are stopping by to pester some of her parental units, having had our fill of bothering her mom in Fishersville. We’ve been here since late evening Saturday, and have had a lovely time so far, enjoying in particular the top-notch cuisine which doesn’t hurt the urge to be repeat visitors.

On Saturday night, we honestly didn’t do a whole lot, since we spent most of the day driving to get here, and a fair amount of Sunday was also low-key, but come Sunday evening myself, Corelyn, her dad, and Linda took a little hour-and-a-half car trip out to Chatanooga to meet up with Laura for dinner at a local favorite restaurant called “Big River” something or other (I’m sure it was some variation on “grille” or “brewery,” since the place featured both). The food was absolutely wonderful, and we found ourselves still planted in our seats several hours later, laughing and carrying on like the suspicious characters our loved ones know us to be. It was a fine time, and the sweetness was only increased by being parked near an absolutely gorgeous Lamborghini Murcielago, which I promptly camera-phone-ed to several envious friends. The one hitch: the thing was, in Linda’s words, “frog green.” This is one of those moments in life where rational explanation is just wanting. Lamborghinis, you understand, are not cheap things to acquire, and given the opportunity, how could a person so permanently soil the occasion by selecting such a color? I propose the following theories:

1. Colorblindness

2. Some kind of “this color is hideous and we couldn’t sell it” discount

3. A last-minute pinch-defense after dressing in blue on Saint Patrick’s Day

4. The car is just really, really envious about someting

Take your pick, I have more.

Today, much to my delight, Mr. Coates was good enough to treat his daughter and I to a showing of “The Dark Knight” in IMAX, which I must say was quite an experience, particularly on the audio level. The picture was gorgeous, sure, but given that much of the movie was filmed in IMAX, it looks very natural. But my goodness, the sound. Believe me when I tell you, we genuinely mistook it for an oncoming thunderstorm on our way into the theater.

Speaking of “The Dark Knight” briefly, you should know it’s absolutely destroying the box office, having set several more records: fastest dash to $300 million dollars (did it in five days), biggest IMAX movie, and strongest Monday (I think). There is little to stop it from breaching the $500 million mark at this pace, and that’s just domestically. There is no question that “The Dark Knight” is on fire, demonstrating what a deadly one-two punch good reviews and lots of special effects really is.

So, moving right along, Corelyn and I are scrambling to complete our moving plans. We have a likely suspect for our new apartment in the historic Wilshire district, which we’re told is nice, and we’ll hopefully be getting our names attached to a nice, 7th floor room by week’s end (the view is allegedly great). It’s not for sure yet, so don’t get too committed to the idea, but I have a good feeling about this one.

For those of you that may remember, I am continuing work on “Archangel,” the story project I’ve been slaving over since the beginning of this year. The story centers around a fictional telling of the Devil’s rebellion from Heaven, and proposes to define concepts such as time, free will and evil. No small task. The first draft was completed at about 180 pages, and although many of its ideas persist into my next version, I suspect that more discipline will be necessary on my part this time around. I had a lot of fun just going with the flow, but it rambled and pontificated to an excessive degree, and it’s about time to reign the whole thing in.

It’s a funny thing about art (on a somewhat related subject), and how art and artist can be so separate. Through my love of Batman, I’ve been cultivating a deep appreciation for the comic book medium, and the rare opportunities it offers as a visual medium. One of my favorite authors in this realm is a British gentleman named Alan Moore, whose work is the direct inspiration of such recent films as “V for Vendetta” and “Constantine.” Now, Moore’s work is difficult and highly “intellectual” (in ways both good and bad), but I find myself greatly endeared to the ethical conclusions and philosophical questions that he poses; in short, I tend to agree with him. In “Batman: The Killing Joke,” he articulates that forgiveness of even the most heinous crimes is a liberating act, a force of good that cannot be denied. In “Watchmen,” he ponders the complicated and difficult nature of heroism in the real world by reinventing superheroes, making them fallible and occasionally insane. In this and other things he’s written, I find a vast array of real intellectual challenge, and am constantly pleased with how Moore chooses to fight these battles.

And yet.

Alan Moore in real life is about the farthest thing from anyone I would ever agree with. The dude worships a Roman snake deity…seriously, he does. I’m not kidding. It’s called “Glycon.” He’s also an anarchist and an occultist. This is not a person I have anything in common with, but somehow the things he has to say in his writing always resonate with me. In keeping with a tradition established earlier in this post, I offer several explanations for this:

1. I’m completely misreading everything he’s ever done, on a level alarming both for its consistency and its depth of reasoning

2. I too worship a Roman snake deity. Thank you, merciful Glycon, for the courage to finally admit it.

3. Alan has a ghost writer whom he has many belabored story meetings with, and this guy keeps cutting scenes like the one where Robin mumbles the secret words to the Bat-Cauldron for the sake of Gotham as he stirs vigorously with a giant, wooden mallet…which I guess would be the “Bat-Mallet.”

I’ve got more. I always do.

Anyway, to be honest with you, some of me now visualizes “Archangel” as a graphic novel, if only because this medium allows for the visual focus that my stories always demand, combined with budgetary requirements that wouldn’t rival the economy of a small country (ahem, cinema, looking in your direction). In other words, it’s visual and it wouldn’t cost that much. Still, my focus is to tell a story, not to nitpick over what medium that story eventually belongs in.

Oh, one last thing: Linda’s daughter Mandy owns a tiny little dog named Nelly who is absolutely adorable. I’m usually a hard sell on little canines, but this one is so full of personality even I can’t resist. She is particularly fond of locking eye contact with you as long as possible, then rigorously kissing your face in bizarre places no one wants to be licked on, such as the underside of the nose. Something in this little girl just must plant a wet one on that location, and she goes about her attempts at this with almost more urgency than affection. She’s a dog on a mission.

Everyone’s watching “The Kingdom” downstairs, which I’ve already seen, so I did a patented “Rew sneak” out of the living room while no one was paying attention. I can hear my wife coming up the stairs now to punish me for this; she wanted me to remain and explain plot points to her. Glycon protect me.

“Now there’s a Batman”

Okay, so the review, which was frankly more of a labor of love than anything, is now out of the way. Now I can get down to what I’ve really been anxious to do, which is analyze some of the themes and motifs that I think made “The Dark Knight” so wonderfully complex. I’ve had a request or two to focus on a few lines in particular, and I intend to honor those (that’s you, Aaron).

Let’s get started! Oh, and obviously, if you haven’t seen the movie, you really shouldn’t read this.

“THE DARK KNIGHT”

1. “They’re only as good as the world allows them to be.”

The Joker says this to Batman during the interrogation scene, if you recall. He claims that any ethical code adopted by any person is fundamentally ridiculous, and will be “dropped at the first sign of trouble.” But why would the Joker believe this? What necessitates for him that people are evil? That we can’t know for sure, because his back-story is kept deliberately mysterious (don’t be fooled by his contradictory versions of how he got his scars, they’re all lies). To be honest, it’s quite beside the point what brought the Clown Prince of Crime to this conclusion, what matters is that he intends to prove it. Let’s see if he did.

Each of his major crimes can be broken down into a fundamental attack on any code of ethics. Or, to put it another way, everything the Joker does is actually some kind of awful joke: the opening bank heist uses greed to tempt each bank robber into committing what they think is only a momentary lapse in loyalty to one another. Each of them, except for “Grumpy” (the name in the script for the guy who gets hit by the bus), expects their behavior to remain in a vacuum, but the joke is that nothing remains in a vacuum. Technically, each of them thinks they’re only killing one person, but a hypocritical mentality that relies on the good behavior of others is eventually quite destructive. Human beings tend to justify lapses in their better judgment with the belief that their actions can be contained within their own lives. To put it simply, each of them thinks, “It’ll just be this one time, and only I’ll do it.” The Joker knows better: what you do echoes outward, and he demonstrates that very effectively here.

Let’s also consider the now-infamous “Magic Trick,” a gag so stunning and clever that it gets an audible reaction from the theater every time I see the movie. It’s a simple but brilliant act of misdirection: notice how the Joker waves his hands crazily around the pencil as the thug approaches him, pretending to be working on making the pencil go away. Of course, he’s actually waiting for the thug to get to him, but the Joker knows that his appearance and demeanor allows others to underestimate him, and he always uses this fact brilliantly. It also comes in handy when he murders Gambol, who is too ready to believe the Joker is dead, because he can’t fathom being fooled by a costumed freak. Later in the movie, the Joker tells Harvey Dent, “Do I really look like a guy with a plan?” Harvey buys this line, and wrecks his vengeance on the mob instead of the Joker, even though he was really the mastermind behind Rachel’s death. And, of course, this trick almost works again when Gordon orders a SWAT team to assault the Joker’s hideout at the end of the movie, not suspecting that the guys in the clown masks are really the hostages. The joke here is simple: human beings are suckers for appearances, no matter how much they should know better.

And of course, there’s the Sohie’s choice he puts Batman and Gordon through when he straps Rachel and Harvey to separate bombs and only gives their friends time to reach one of them. The Joker, of course, has already seen that Batman is highly protective of Rachel, so he assumes that she is the one he’ll choose to save and lies about where she is. He does this for two reasons: firstly, because he’s relatively sure that Batman will arrive in time to save whoever he chooses, but Gordon won’t (after all, he’s got the Bat-pod!), and he wants to make sure Harvey lives. Secondly, he wants to strip both Batman and Gordon of any feeling of agency: Batman couldn’t save Rachel because he was lied to, and Gordon couldn’t save anyone because he just couldn’t get there fast enough. The joke here is that humanity is not “in control,” and that the best-laid plans are easily destroyed with a simple lie.

So. Does the Joker win? Does he prove that humanity is hypocritical, stupid, and completely out of control?

Not quite. “The Dark Knight” wants you to *feel* like the Joker is correct for much of the running time, but the scene with the two ferries is this movie’s way of turning the tables on the Caliph of Clowns. This is where the Joker’s plan ultimately fails: both boats are tempted to blow up the other, but neither can bring themselves to do it. When midnight strikes and no one is dead, the Joker is visibly annoyed, and Batman proudly barks, “What did you want to prove? That deep down, everyone’s like you? You are alone.” And that, ladies and gentlemen, is a revelation about the Joker: he doesn’t want to be alone. His desire for anarchy and bloodshed comes from a need to feel connected with the rest of the world, to feel like he belongs among humanity. He can only feel this if everyone is like him, but at the end of the day, “The Dark Knight” does not believe we are. We can be very bad, yes, but we can also rise above it. Indeed, we have a two-fold identity, much like Harvey Dent and Batman do.

2. “You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.”

Chilling words, uttered by Harvey Dent and again by the Dark Knight himself when Two Face is killed. Dent was referencing the “emergency powers” granted to a ruler in Rome in a time of crisis, but Rachel wisely points out that eventually these powers became permanent, crisis or not. It’s easy to see how chillingly the fall of Rome’s republic can be applied to Batman: sure, technically the Dark Knight only intends to operate for as long as Gotham “needs” him, but once someone has the kind of power he possesses, giving it up is simply against human nature.

There are three main heroes in “The Dark Knight”: Jim Gordon, Batman and Harvey Dent. Every single one of them lives long enough to see themselves become the villain, just as Dent predicted. Each of them does it in different ways, and each to very different degrees, but the tragedy is still there. This is what makes this movie such an exceptionally complex piece of cinema. Let’s take a look at how each of them discovers their own capacity to be reduced by evil to their own worst enemy.

-Batman. The Dark Knight begins this story looking for a way out of being the hero, hoping to pass the mantle to someone else and maybe get a second chance at being with Rachel, whom he has loved all his life. The Joker, however, interrupts this. His spree of chaos, which is aimed squarely at Batman, puts Gotham into a frenzy that Bruce never could have imagined. He quickly comes to realize that even though the Joker claims he will relent as soon as Batman turns himself in, this cannot really be trusted, and would not constitute any kind of victory. Nonetheless, he knows that he is responsible for inspiring this new villain’s wave of murder, and over and over he finds himself unable to stop his foe. This constant feeling of impotence drives Batman to do several things he would never have imagined: the first is his massive sonar grid, which goes against even the most rudimentary system of ethics and freedom. There is no happy resolution for this plot thread, even though the device is destroyed. Batman resorts to unethical means to stop the Joker, and this violates the basic freedom he is supposed to be protecting. The second act that breaches his code is the semi-accidental murder of Harvey Dent. Now, to be sure, anyone can understand why Batman felt he had to act immediately to save the life of Gordon’s son, but killing is something the Dark Knight *cannot* participate in.

This, really, is the reason he is so willing to have Gordon blame Harvey’s crimes on him. Batman feels deep in his heart that, on some level, Dent’s sins really were his. He has violated his own code twice out of desperation, so playing the villain to Gotham City is easy for him to do; he *feels* like the villain.

-Jim Gordon. The soon-to-be-Commissioner Gordon has what might be considered the smallest fall from grace, but it hits him hard nonetheless. Gordon prides himself on being an honest cop, and has built his entire life on that principle, but his policy of abiding the corruption he sees in the department no longer works. He is in a position of *power* as Lieutenant, and he should be rooting corruption out, but he goes lax. He feels like he needs the manpower too much, even when Dent warns him explicitly that the people closest to him are not to be trusted. Eventually, Harvey and Rachel pay the price for this, and Gordon learns the hard way that he should have listened. Even though he is Gotham’s most noble police man, he finds that even he has been corrupted in his own way. It’s a hard lesson.

-Harvey Dent/Harvey Two Face. Harvey takes the biggest fall of all of them, and his is in many ways the simplest. The Joker targets Dent because he wants Gotham’s white knight brought down to his knees, and he suspects quite correctly that his love of Rachel is the key to doing it. Long before Dent becomes Two Face, we see glimpses of rage and arrogance boiling underneath his calm surface. Harvey is a good man who wants to protect the people of Gotham, but his demons are looming around the corner. He is violent, impulsive, and obsessed with *fairness* to a very dangerous degree. That two-headed trick coin of his represents his false belief that he can control the world, that he can “make my own luck.” He can’t, and a person like the Joker is determined to prove that to him.  As this maniacal madman wrests all feeling of control from Harvey’s life, the final coup de gras being the death of his beloved Rachel, the former white knight gives in to vigilante justice because he simply *must* have fairness, whatever the cost. He was only ever committed to the law because he believed it would never let him down. But of course, the law lets us all down sometimes. Harvey simply is not ready for this, and his blinding rage demands that everyone around him lose what he lost, because that is what’s “fair.”

But then why flip a coin to determine his actions? Because for Harvey, all of life is now that coin. It’s cold, unbiased, unfeeling, completely random. He gets more satisfaction from *forcing* his enemies to be subject to that coin than he does from actually killing them, because that makes them fall into his notion of fair.  Dent thinks he’s learned the true nature of life the hard way, and he cannot stand for anyone to escape it. Remember that Dent made his name in Internal Affairs, and his specialty has always been exposing people who think they can have special treatment. The idea of corruption infuriates him, and now that Rachel is dead and his face is scarred, anyone who does not submit to the same 50/50 chance he had of losing everything is corrupt.

Whew! A lot to take in! Why don’t we pause for a recess, eh? More later!

How About a Magic Trick?

There are basically two groups of people in the world right now:

1. People who have seen “The Dark Knight,” and who love it. That is many of you reading this, and let us now share a snicker together at the scene referenced by the title. Let’s take a minute and remember how terrifyingly awesome that scene was. Then remember another. Then another. Mmmmm.

2. People who have not partaken of “The Dark Knight,” and those who didn’t like it. We, group number one, are not angry at either; nay, we simply pity thee. Thou art adrift in a barren desert of cinema, not comprehending the balmy oasis of dramatic complexity and jaw-dropping action which passes by you undetected. Consider yourself in our prayers.

As I’m sure you’re aware, “The Dark Knight” came out. Rest assured, I am absolutely going to review the heck out of it, because that’s the special honor it deserves, but first I’d like to drop a little knowledge on you. As of right now, “The Dark Knight” is holding four world records: it is the first major studio movie to utilize an IMAX camera (although they didn’t shoot the whole movie that way), it is the most lucrative midnight showing of any movie in history (it made $18 million off of midnight showings alone, not counting the 3 am and 6 am bookings that had to be added), it’s the biggest opening day (taking in around $67 million, which beats out “Spider Man 3″‘s $55 million or so), and it has also clinched the biggest opening weekend with $155 million, again robbing the title from the terrible “Spiderman 3.” I find it highly unlikely the film will not continue on its present course, because movies with good reviews and positive audience reactions tend to have legs, and “The Dark Knight” has those things. “Spider Man 3″ had a knockout opening, but the movie was a huge disappointment and quickly sank. “The Dark Knight” has come out swinging even harder, and by all accounts it’s going to keep going from here.

All right, folks. I haven’t done a review in a long time, but since this movie has arrived I feel it’s time for me to come out of retirement, crack my knuckles, and get to work.

“The Dark Knight”: 5 out of 5 stars.

Let’s just get right down to it, shall we? “The Dark Knight” is the greatest movie I’ve ever seen; if you want my honest opinion, I think it’s one of the greatest movies ever made. It’s a movie so completely two things at once it demands more than a single viewing. As a drama, its complexity is on par with the great crime dramas like “The Godfather” and “Heat.” As an action movie, its “we really did it” stunts and nail-biting suspense evoke the technical mastery of Frankenheimer’s “Ronin” and the relentless tension of Hithcock. When was the last time a superhero movie dropped you into the middle of a Sophie’s choice? How about two or three of them?

Assuming total ignorance of the film’s plot, I will endeavor to maintain that state while indulging only the briefest of story overviews: Batman has been operating in Gotham for around a year, and the political, social and criminal climate is beginning to react to him in both good and bad ways. For the good, there’s a new crusading district attorney named Harvey Dent who symbolizes a hope that the city has never dared to maintain. In the bad column, a psychopathic madman called the “Joker” has begun a string of masterfully executed crimes aimed precisely at pushing the Caped Crusader to his breaking point, and bringing Gotham City down into utter chaos.

“The Dark Knight’s” legacy will be that it changed the face of the superhero movie by loading it with moral dilemnas and flawed, three-dimensional characters. Although many noble efforts from Dick Donner’s “Superman” to the recent “Iron Man” have begun forcing the genre to be fully appreciated by a mainstream audience, they have all more or less danced the campy dance required of them. Even Nolan’s previous effort in the Bat-universe, “Batman Begins,” happily embraced an over-the-top climax in homage to its roots. Honestly, that makes a lot of sense to me–it must have taken some time to get the courage worked up to make a summer blockbuster whose heart beats like an American tragedy.

As a superhero movie, Chris Nolan’s “Knight” is a brutally subversive film, much like the cackling villain it contains. It is a piece of cinema escaping from its own genre by rewriting the rules of its cliches. It must provide action sequences, so it does, but it wriggles from its shackles by making those scenes more about nail-biting suspense than anything else. Instead of sitting back and detaching, we grip our seats and hold our breath. We demand that it give us an entertaining villain, and it complies, but the monster Nolan unleashes completely blindsides the audience. The Joker is fully evil, more capable of anarchy and madness than we’d ever imagined, and the questions he asks the Dark Knight (and by proxy the audience) about human nature and ethics haunt us in the parking lot as we fumble for our keys. He’s also the most compulsively watchable, drop-your-jaw stunning screen character in a decade or more; you simply have not experienced a shiver down your spine like this since Hannibal Lecter. Anton Chigurh from “No Country for Old Men” seems like a poodle by comparison.

Although Heath Ledger’s Joker is deservedly kicking up a lot of dust (more on him later), the movie that surrounds him is equal to his greatness. “The Dark Knight” offers greatness in every department. Christopher Nolan has honed his action directing considerably, letting the scenes breathe more and maintaining a heightened sense of danger. Even more impressive, however, is that he has made the quiet scenes the *real* pay-off moments. Don’t get me wrong, “The Dark Knight” can go toe-to-toe with anything as an action movie, but the human element is where the real meat is. When our heroes and villains start really talking to one another, Nolan does what only the best directors do: he unleashes his actors and gets the hell out of the way, making his camera as invisible as he possibly can. He wants us all the way into the scene, completely lost in the moment, unable to remember the corners of the movie screen. He succeeds. As magnetic as the Joker and Batman are in combat, when the war turns psychological the movie sinks its teeth in.

Acting is another base covered, and it’s covered very well. Christian Bale, like his director, has shaken off any possible timidness around Batman and now portrays him with authority. I loved in particular how Bruce Wayne’s face would grow dark and serious when the Joker popped up on the evening news–I felt like I could see the beast rising out of him. Bale has always been a fan favorite in the role, and it’s hard to imagine anyone else under the cowl. Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman reprise their roles with grace and class, and the script rewards them both with more screen time. Alfred and Lucius Fox respectively are both larger players in the story, each at some point forced into as much conflict as agreement with the titular hero. Maggie Gyllenhaal replaces Katie Holmes, and I think I speak for us all when I say, “thank God.” She’s a tall, stunningly beautiful woman with fiery intelligence and real courage in the face of danger. The love triangle she creates between Bruce, herself and Harvey makes a lot of sense.

Speaking of the new district attorney, Aaron Eckhart is really the unsung hero of this picture. Providing the story arc’s backbone, he commits completely to Harvey Dent and sucks the audience into the romance of the character. But the darkness is already there before tragedy steps in: Dent is a man a little too dedicated to getting his results, and we see before his first scene is over that there are disturbing lengths he might go to if pushed. I liked in particular how Eckhart’s voice would sharpen into a furious bark when his character lost control of his temper; every time it happened, the audience I saw the picture with jumped a little.

Gary Oldman as Lt. Gordon is utterly stunning, a complete revelation. In “Batman Begins,” his honesty and slightly clumsy disposition was a wonderful foil for Bale’s primal physicality, and a fresh take on the character. But in “The Dark Knight,” Gordon is an older and harder man, only more devoted to his ideals as the challenges pile up on him. In every little moment of his portrayal, Oldman conveys a thoroughly decent man, and he does it so quietly that he tricks the audience into thinking they figured it out for themselves. “The Dark Knight” may be Batman’s show, but Gordon gets a much bigger piece of the pie this time around, the audience is more than happy to see it.

And now comes the part of the review where I discuss Heath Ledger. You’ve all heard it before, and it was absolutely true, he’s a walking event. Acting this great does not belong to the realm of discussion, it is a matter of simply watching it. Many have speculated that the movie will be tinkered with by Ledger’s unfortunate death, but the cackling monster that inhabits this movie will never for a single moment register as “Heath Ledger, Australian actor” in your head. You will see only “The Joker.” He is just so damned *good,* there isn’t any way to do it justice, but let me try this way: there is a brief moment in this film when the Joker is not wearing his make-up (I won’t get into why), and he still doesn’t look like Heath Ledger. He stares straight into the camera, but it just isn’t him. Don’t let anyone tell you the make-up department did the heavy lifting, it was Ledger from the start. He’s not only the best Joker of all-time, I would submit he is the equal, if not the better, of any screen villain as well.

So “The Dark Knight” acting and directing down so far, but the script has to come through for the whole thing to work, and it does. There were several ways to play this movie, but Jonathan and Christopher Nolan opted for the gutsiest path they could imagine: an epic movie, stuffed with plot and speeding desperately along to contain it all in under three hours. The movie races to its finish line, but it never frenzies, and the “excessive” length some are complaining about is the result of key scenes being allowed to linger long enough to savor. I love watching this movie set its goal almost impossibly high, and then fling itself towards it with total commitment and no fear.

More than that, though, “The Dark Knight’s” script is the root of how radical a departure it is from what has gone before. Batpods and mid-air rescues are here, but Chris and Jonah unapologetically push their Batman to the brink of his body and his mind. Their movie is rich and exhilarating, but it aims for “thrilling” instead of “fun,” and it hits the target right on its head. Ever since Ang Lee made a mopey mess of “Hulk,” no one has dared try this, but the Nolans are unafraid, and their gamble pays off. The idea of watching a bunch of fluff violence no longer sounds appealing once this movie gets going; it sounds kind of…silly.

“The Dark Knight” is also already resonating on a deeper emotional level with its audience. Interviewers are constantly badgering Nolan to “fess up” to making a thinly veiled movie about the war on terror, but he consistently denies it because, quite frankly, it isn’t true. What the director *did* do was make a movie about themes that are applicable to the entire scope of human history, so a person with the Iraq war on their mind is going to see parallels and readily as someone fascinated by the Roman empire. “The Dark Knight” deals with the basic quality of human nature, the need for order and ethics, and whether or not certain lines can or should be crossed. It’s a movie about a broken social contract between a state and its people, and whether or not violence can repair that bond. It’s also about the human species: how completely hypocritical and vile we’re capable of being, and yet how great we might become if we demand it from ourselves. The trappings of a superhero movie work perfectly to let these deeper issues sneak up behind us as we’re dazzled by heroism and villainy. “The Dark Knight” is a perfect marriage of a drama and a superhero movie. It is, fundamentally, a story about how hard goodness is to keep up, how tempting evil always makes itself, and how terrifyingly free we each are to choose between them.

Well that’s that. Next time I’m going to launch into a VERY SPOILER-FILLED examination of the moral issues the movie present for those of you who have seen the film.

Warfare

The smoke billowed in the distance, choking the sunlight in the sky above us. As I stood in front of my army, I knew their spirits were broken. They held their rocket launchers, their link guns, their AVRiL anti-vehicle weapons, and their beam rifles low in their arms, swooning with the labor pains of acquiescence. Arranged around me in a horse shoe, each of them wore a heaviness on their shoulders I had scarcely imagined before. I knew each of these soldiers by name: Jester, Bishop…uh, that other guy…okay I knew some of them by name. The point is, I’d waged many a battle with these metal-clad marines, and I knew when they were about to give up.

We had a simple objective: take possession of several power “nodes” and hold them, creating a flow of energy across the battlefield that would connect us to our enemy’s power core and allow us to destroy it. At the same time, of course, we had to prevent our foe, the scurvy dogs of “Blue Team,” from rendering the same fate upon our beloved “Red” core. After a strong start, we had lost every single power node to Blue, and our precious core was slowly dying in our arms. Their armies were an unstoppable wave of tanks, jets, and hovercraft generated by the extra power their node dominance afforded them. Their will seemed undeniable. They were closing in.

That’s the moment I gave the talk. A Saint Crispin’s Day Speech, if you will. Only I didn’t talk any flowery nonsense about “we happy few, we band of brothers.” I looked my team dead in the eye and told it like it was…or rather, I told it to my television screen, standing mightily in front of the couch in my boxers, and I did so very quietly, because Corelyn was sleeping in the next room:

“Soldiers,” I began, “Patriots. Friends. Today I can honestly say, without reservation, that I am ashamed to be your commander. You’re a bunch of tambourine-shaking hippie cowards. Last time I checked, pressing the X button orders you maggots to ‘hold this position.’ But maybe I didn’t check the game manual thoroughly enough, because apparently the orders you received were ‘Sit there like a bunch of tools.’ God help me, you look like Army Reserve rejects out there, begging for mercy every time those Blue mongrels summon up a tank. You’ve got rocket launchers, for crying out loud! Shoot the damned things, blow something up!

And here’s another thing: I want an explanation for why I die faster when I tell you boneheads to “cover me.” Explain it. Now. Shut up, I don’t want to hear it! When I order covering fire, I sure as hell better be able to stroll happily to the enemy power core on a magical path of Blue corpses!

Now, I’m going to go single-handedly take back our Power Nodes. Again. Then I’m going to order you to ‘Hold. This. Position.’ That is an order, not the Second Amendment, so obey it blindly. You’re going to live at that Power Node. It will be your home. During the day you’ll think about the enemy Power Core exploding, and at night you’ll dream of Nodes, and how protecting them is your soul’s delight. You’ll wonder sometimes what the outside world is like, but only for a moment, because all you can remember is how you’re never ever leaving this spot ever. You’re going to sit there and kill things that move. You can kill me if I walk by and happen to look “blue” to you because you’ve gone so insane just standing there guarding that Power Node. After we’ve won the game, because you did your job finally, and I come to tell you that it’s all right for you to stop guarding the Power Node, you’re still not allowed to move. If I tell you, ‘This isn’t a test, you really are done,’ stay there anyway. Just stay. When you’ve starved to death, then you can leave the Power Node.

This is zero-hour, people. I’m not going to shoot sunshine up your nose, we’re in a bad place here. Blue Team wants to stomp all over our genitals and I can’t imagine what’s going to stop them unless we cowboy-the-heck-up right about now. Now you all are, as I said, embarrassing failures, and I would like nothing more than to join Blue Team and abandon you forever, but this game does not allow that, so I’m stuck with you. But I swear on the graves of every goldfish I’ve ever owned that if you don’t grow a pair and start making some widows out there on that field of battle, I’m going to press ‘Start,’ go to ‘Options,’ turn ‘Friendly Fire’ to ‘On,’ and execute every one of you.

Does everyone understand? Excellent. Go Read Team.”

And that’s when the magic happened. Like all of those great sports movies you’ve seen, or like the end of Henry V, Red Team came together. We played off of one another, we fought vigorously, we darted and weaved. We took one node, then another, then all of them, and then we took the Blue Power Core to town and just barely did more damage to it than Blue did to ours as the “overtime” clock ticked down to nothing.

We won. I sat on the couch, weeping for joy and thrusting my fists in the air…again really quietly. We had done it. The speech had worked.

….

…Of course, every single soldier on the battlefield other than I was run by an artificial intelligence program. And true, I had no microphone connected, and even if I did, none of these AI bots were programmed with even the most rudimentary voice recognition.

Still! If these computer-generated warriors have souls, somewhere out there in the nether region of digital code, then I touched those binary souls of theirs.

Or I remembered that the X button reloads. The D-Pad is actually the one that sends orders. Whoops.

I’m an uncle…again!!

Hey dear reader, this is going to be a quick one: at about 7 am (or that’s what I hear), Holly gave birth to Brady Benjamin Allen!!! He’s 8 lbs, 8 oz. (again, word on the street), very healthy, and apparently the labor was extremely easy. This is Brady and Holly’s third child!

WHOOO!!!!!! We are SO excited!!

The Battle Eternal

Maybe you’ve been there before too: you stand in a fluorescent-lit money trap, your sneakers squeaking on the polished floor, pressed between rows of colorful trinkets you absolutely do not need. In each hand is an object, completely unnecessary to your continued survival, the shrink-wrap collecting oily sweat from your fingers. They are but things, nine times out of ten made of simple plastic and offering little in the way of insight into the human condition.

But you must have them. And there’s only room in your wallet right now for one.

The agony is unrelenting, dear reader. Whenever I am going to purchase anything on any variety of “budget,” I invariably end up with two choices of the exact same price which divorce my soul into two separate, equally coveting halves. These battles can go on for hours. I need not tell you the grisly details of the “Resident Evil 4 versus Metroid Prime: Corruption” struggle that raged for hours within a Gamestop one summer afternoon. Let’s just say it got so bad that a call had to be placed to William Cover to end the civil war once and for all.

In case you think I’m crazy, let me inform you that my wife is standing directly behind me at this very moment, wielding a large knife in one hand and an onion in the other, having no less than a conversation with the latter. She is reasoning with it, insisting that it “wasn’t in the refrigerator for that long,” and calling upon the onion’s sense of duty: “I was planning on using you tonight! You were an important part of this meal!”

I’m just saying, there are crazier things than being stuck on a purchase–things like anthropomorphizing a vegetable.

Anyway, my predicament was thus: a double-feature DVD of the first two “Resident Evil” movies (before you say a word, know this: I have written songs based on Ingmar Bergman films, I have a favorite Akira Kurosawa film, and I’m allowed a guilty pleasure!), or, for the same price, “Minority Report” and “Mad Max” (the latter of which I’d never seen). You see, Corelyn and I discovered yet another Target gift card from our wedding that we hadn’t used, and my cut of its total allowed for one of these two options. After rigorous debate, I decided it was impossible to choose, and that I would just need to have the “Resident Evil” pack AND “Mad Max,” going over my limit by an incredibly reasonable four dollars. Turns out, Corelyn was splurging on her half as well, so she was in no position to critique me. All’s well that ends flat broke.

What, you ask, was she going over her limit on? Vegetables. Frozen green beans and broccoli. No, I’m not kidding with you. I have never known a human being so transfixed by a class of food designed specifically by Jesus Christ Himself to make other edible things more delicious by comparison. My theory for this phenomenon is simple: for a large part of her adolescence, Corelyn was a vegetarian. A romantic relationship with me soon made this course of life impossible, because you can only watch so many tender, juicy hamburgers be consumed from across the table before the omnivore in your genetic wiring kicks in, but even after I rescued her from this disastrous way of existence, a mark remained on her. She has, I believe, some kind of culinary Stockholm Syndrome.

The going is still hard over here in Charlottesville, but we are managing nonetheless, and I must say Cor and I have a lot of fun spending time with each other in spite of everything. I feel so blessed to have her as my companion, particularly at times like this. She’s steady, tough and sympathetic, always there no matter what. I myself am trying to maintain the role of Male Egotist (short for “ME”), blazing into every situation confident of how much cooler we are than everyone. When you’re single, confidence only goes so far, because it’s just you and everyone doubts themselves. When you’re married, though, you’re a team, and you always think your partner is awesome, so by association you must be as well. It sends the old vanity through the roof.

Let me give you an example: the wife and I were out for a nice Mexican dinner (our first meal out in some time), for which we had budgeted a small but reasonable sum of money. We were enjoying our dinner in spite of the obnoxiously loud open mic going on behind us, but things began to fall apart when a fly was discovered in my food.

Not good.

Naturally, I contacted the waiter and asked for a replacement in a to-go box. He agreed, and sportingly provided me with just that, but when the bill arrived I discovered I had been charged for the same meal twice. Sneaky devil. I summoned our waiter back over and told him I had expected the replacement free. Corelyn later pointed out that long before he arrived at our table, he looked like he knew what this was going to be about.

“Well, we can’t just do that. We can’t just give you a free meal because a fly fell into your food,” he asserted very calmly.

Oh yes, hot-shot. Yes you can. “But the meal was ruined,” I retorted.

“Yeah but that’s not our fault.”

“It’s your establishment,” I stated.

“I know it’s our establishment,” he replied. Not really any kind of argument, but okay.

“I want this meal replaced,” I put flatly.

“I can talk to the manager, but he’s not going to allow it. He’s going to be really mad.”

Oh, I’m terrified. “Send him to me,” I said.

“I can do that if you want.”

“You talk to him first,” I said, “And then if he won’t do it, send him to me.”

Folks, I was a waiter once. It was the worst, most hellish job I’ve ever performed, but I did it. I know how restaurants work, and there isn’t a blue-jean wearing Ryan Gosling look-alike waiter in this world who’s going to tell me it’s a heretical notion that a meal has to be re-prepared. It happens all the time, and a diseased insect is one of the better reasons I’ve ever heard to do it.

And let’s be clear about something else: flies do happen, and no matter how clean a restaurant is they will probably appear once in awhile to ruin someone’s meal. That does not, however, remove you from responsibility. I’m sure your restaurant is perfectly sanitary, and I won’t tell anyone any different, but Mother Nature is still going to put one on her tab once in awhile; it just happens. Don’t bat your eyes at me and say there was no way you could have seen it coming. I specifically ordered the “Fajitas without larvae” and that’s sure as hell what I’m going to get. After all, if this happening has to be someone’s fault, it sure as Shinola isn’t mine; I didn’t offer my rice to an ant hill, and I’m not aware of any magical procedures I’m supposed to use when consuming food so that insects don’t want it anymore. And you don’t get to take my money in return for unclean food every now and again, shrugging and writing it off to chance.

I watched our waiter walk over to his manager. They talked for maybe three seconds, and then I got exactly what I asked for. That’s what I thought.

It’s the Little Things

In life, you have to cherish the small things. It seems stupid to let yourself be excited over a movie, or a game, or really nice weather, but these little gifts pack a lot of punch for their size when you let them into your heart. I mention this because today was one of those “little things” days for me; an Xbox 360 game I had been long awaiting was released. Days before, I had reserved my copy and paid for it in full (using store credit, I assure you, not the precious few dollars Corelyn and I actually possess), and now that magical Monday had finally rolled around. I made a mix for the occasion of driving to the store, whistled merrily in the bright summer air, and reflected on how treasuring these moments can make one’s troubles lighter. I felt certain that God wanted me to take in this moment as richly as possible, while at the same time acknowledging that it must pass. Yes, it was a warm, happy occasion as I marched into my local GameStop to make this beloved video gaming experience mine and mine forever.

Turns out, it doesn’t come out until tomorrow.

Little things suck. Don’t treasure the little things. Let me tell you why: when you do treasure them, and then they end up letting you down, you find yourself inexorably pissed off about something that doesn’t matter at all. Sure, it’s fun to get all worked up because a game comes out, but when it’s not to be, you spend the rest of the day moping over a video game. You will not receive sympathy from any sensible man, woman or child on this planet. You won’t even get sympathy from yourself. The worst part is, once the disproportionate misery from a trivial inconvenience rolls away, other things that you should be upset about get that much worse: you have no job and there’s no way to get one, you’re broke, you’re moving across the country in a month and you have no idea where to, the kitchen is a mess, the credit card debt from your wedding is a towering tsunami, your graduate school won’t give you a straight answer as to when you’re starting, and so on and so forth. If an Xbox game put you in a tissy, this motley crew of disasters is going to send you to Mars. Oh and, just to add insult to injury, none of your problems are bad enough to make you feel good about letting them upset you.

Sigh.

I don’t really mean that, dear reader, the little things are an essential part of being happy. But the truth is, every day I have no job to go to, I feel my patience growing thin, and small annoyances have a better and better chance of getting my goat. My temp agency just won’t give me a new assignment, and it’s just not a practical reality to acquire a new job for a month or, more likely, less than that. I feel totally useless, part of me kind of likes to hide from my wife when she gets home from work. I do what I can to be useful around the house, but it’s continually humiliating to know we need money and feel like I can’t do anything to provide it. Even though it was a mindless job, I really loved working at Sri Trang for that one week, mostly because I would think about how I was helping out our little family. Now I’m just costing us money on food and gasoline. I wonder if the lady who arbitrarily ended my contract even thought about having a hand in any of this happening.

Anyway, in the brighter news column, Corelyn and I had a very nice 4th of July weekend in Alexandria. We headed down Thursday night, and were instantly barraged with a somewhat exhausting night of bar-hopping. The next day, Cor went off with Katie Meyer (one of her bridesmaides) and her family to see the fireworks at the White House. From what I understand, the highlight of this event was seeing the Meyers standing right next to President Bush on a balcony overlooking the crowd. Pretty exciting stuff.

As for myself, I went with a large entourage of friends and their families to Potomac Landing, where we played an intense, 2-hour game of football in the pouring rain and then enjoyed the same fireworks my wife was seeing from a different vantage point. That night, of course, was Jason Alea’s (a good friend) 21st birthday, so the exhausted masses sucked in one recuperative breath and stormed Old Towne’s bar scene yet again. We hit something like 8 bars in an hour and a half, taking one rapid-fire drink at each location before departing. Sadly, I was a designated driver (something you volunteer for often when you can’t afford to keep buying drinks), so I mostly watched, but it was still a fitting celebration of Jason’s 21st year in existence.

The next two days were more laid back. The highlight for me was when I warned Billy that I would “crush” him in Wii Tennis, and he decided to take me up on the offer. I absolutely destroyed him; we played somewhere near 10 games and he lost every one. After that, Mike stepped in to see if he could do better, and met the exact same fate. I then traded off to my wife, who also stomped on both of their spirits. Then, in a grand finale, Corelyn and I teamed up against both of them…and the exact same thing happened. All totaled, neither Mike nor Bill won a single game ever. They were both wonderfully good sports about it, I suspect they were developing a weird gluttony for punishment. My fall finally arrived when I faced off against Corelyn, who soundly beat me and thus pronounced herself the Wii Tennis champion. A fitting title, she has excelled past my skill level. *Sniffle* They just…grow up so fast.

If you’re heading to the cinema this weekend, allow me to throw a little knowledge on you:

-”Hellboy 2: The Golden Army” comes out on the 11th, and the word on the street is hugely positive. The director, Guillermo del Toro, is a brilliant guy. Now you should be aware that Hellboy is a very weird breed of superhero movie, so don’t roll in there expecting Spiderman, but it seems to be a safe bet if you’re in the mood for a little eye-popping adventure.

-”Journey to the Center of the Earth.” Much to my surprise, this ridiculous-looking Brendan Frasier vehicle is getting decent press. One caveat though: see it in 3-D or don’t see it. This is a point almost every review I’ve seen emphasizes.

That’s all for today, dear reader. Hope everything is well on your end. Aunt Robin continues to be in our thoughts and prayers, and we hope yours as well. We’re also anxiously awaiting the arrival of Brady Benjamin, who is probably very near his debut and, from what I understand, his mother is anxious to hurry this occasion. This little guy is the main reason Corelyn and I aren’t already on the other side of the country, so you can imagine we are pacing the floor waiting for news.

Tickets, Baby!

Hello, my favorite readers in the whole wide world. How are you? Ssh, don’t answer that, this blog is about me. I GOT DARK KNIGHT TICKETS!!! WHOOOOO!!! I can’t tell you the excitement I’m feeling over knowing that “The Dark Knight” is fast approaching. You should be aware that the reviews so far call it “The Godfather Part II” of comic book movies, and Heath Ledger’s Joker is being talked about for an Oscar nomination.

Just as exciting, the number of people coming with me to the midnight show at the Hoffman has swelled to an impressive 18. This magnificent group all grabbed their tickets within 12 hours of them going on sale. I imagine the people at Movietickets.com were surprised to see so many rapid-fire purchases on a tuesday night at 11:30 pm.

It’s COMING!!! We’re so close I can TASTE IT!

Seriously, though, sorry it’s been a few days since I posted, but I just haven’t been getting in enough car accidents or arboreal misadventures to make me feel I had a worthy post for you all. Still, I have resolved at last to return to the warm embrace of your passing attention as you surf the internet and pretend to look busy (don’t deny it, you scoundrels).

I know some of you rely on me to keep you posted on movies that are out now. This is a service I’m happy to provide, and will endeavor to keep up-to-date with any relevant releases. I’ve seen many of them, but for those I haven’t, I’ve got solid advice from people who have:

-Prince Caspian: I saw it. It was good, but if you didn’t buy the first one, it ain’t gonna convert you.

-Get Smart: I saw it. Much to my surprise, it was a very solid action comedy, with healthy doses of both. Steve Carrell and Anne Hathaway have surprising chemistry, and Alan Arkin is…well…awesome.

-Hancock: I didn’t see it, but pass on it. I happened upon the plot “twists” that the movie offers, and I can promise you they are utterly ridiculous. The movie has a reputation for being uneven and disappointing.

-The Happening: I didn’t see it, but most people who did, even Shyamalan fans, were disappointed. Again, the plot twist might strike you as ridiculous.

-The Incredible Hulk: I saw it, and it was perfectly decent. Very solid action sequences, and a nice, brisk self-awareness. Completely lacking in depth but adequate as summer fun.

-Indiana Jones: Saw it twice, and loved it both times. To be sure, it goes in a much campier direction than any of the last entries, but I liked that it was unique from the others in that way. It involves aliens. If that sounds dumb to you, don’t see it.

-Iron Man: Saw it, it was very good. Better than the “Hulk,” definitely, but not quite as good an action movie. Robert Downey Jr. is magnificent, but the climactic battle is a little perfunctory.

-Kung Fu Panda: I saw it, I liked it. It rarely tries to be hilarious, which may surprise you, but the story is surprisingly complex and three dimensional.

-The Love Guru: I did not see it, and neither should you. Pass, pass, pass.

-Sex and the City: I didn’t see it, but its reputation is very predictable: fans of the show love it, everyone else hates it.

-The Strangers: I didn’t see it, and the jury’s kind of out. It looked really terrifying in the trailers, I’ve heard mixed things. If you’re in the mood for a horror movie, consider giving it a shot. I am under the impression that it’s low on the gore and high on the suspense, thank God.

-Wall-E: Haven’t seen it, but it doesn’t matter. All reports, both critics and friends of mine, say it’s a classic. Pixar does it again.

-Wanted: Saw it, liked it. It’s got an over-the-top sensory overload style that may turn off the older crowd, but it’s a decently satisfying action movie. I thought the conclusion of the story was ballsy and brilliant.

So there you go. That’s the word on movies I’ve seen and heard about recently. I’ll keep doing this from time to time and let you know how the new movies coming out are being reviewed, and also hopefully let you know if I actually see them.

You know, Corelyn and I have both soured a little on Wii Tennis. The reason is simple: we’ve gotten so good at it, particularly as a team, that the game has begun bending the rules so we can’t beat AI opponents who are supposed to be twice our skill level. Suddenly, a perfectly decent swing will cause the ball to hit the net, or a bounce on the white line will be “out” where it would have been legal other times. We’re both getting a sense that the game didn’t intend this level of commitment, and is now scrambling to fake levels of depth it does not possess. Our patience is tested, dear reader, our patience is tested.

I’ve also been playing “Enemy Territory: Quake Wars,” the demo version. This build of the game has only a single map to play on, and one series of objectives to complete therein, and yet I have played it for days. “Quake Wars” is one of those games where you are tossed into a massive, 16-player battle as one among many infantry men, and given access to a wide cadre of tanks, jeeps, ATVs, even airplanes and helicopters, with which to play. It’s an extremely satisfying strategic experience, with each vehicle or weapon balanced out by another, and every “class” of soldier (medic, engineer, etc) given distinct attributes. In order to win the day, you must strategically employ all of the vehicles and classes at your disposal. These kinds of games always can be played online against other people, but “bots” (computer-controlled opponents) are provided, and I much prefer them to real human beings. I can set them to whatever difficulty I desire, they play fairly, and I don’t have to hear them grip in my headset for ten minutes about how cheap my last kill was. The 12 year olds on Xbox Live are on their own, I’ll take the neutral, emotionless embrace of computerized friendship.

The funny thing is, the game has terrible reviews, and I can scarcely doubt it deserves them. The graphics are muddy, the auto-aim is too nice, and the vehicles control like magic carpets, lacking grit or a sense of weight. Add on top of that the fact that I only have one map to play on, and the experience should get old fast, but the core gameplay mechanic works too well. I find myself having a really great time, so much so that I’ve played it for days on end. Fortunately, “Unreal Tournament 3,” a MUCH superior rendition of the same genre of game, comes out this monday, and yours truly has already reserved and paid for a copy. Once I have that sweet baby in my hot little hands, “Quake Wars” will be but a shadow of a memory.

Anyway, it’s off to Alexandria today to hang out with the good folks there for the 4th of July and such. Corelyn has an invitation to see fireworks at the White House, while myself and the gang of scoundrels I associate with will be making our own breed of merriment to commemorate the occasion. As is fitting, Cor and I have been watching the HBO miniseries “John Adams,” which recently came on DVD, and I have been reading “1776.” I’m developing a real fascination for the story of our country’s birth.

“John Adams,” by the way, is quite good. I prefer the earlier episodes to the latter, which have a troubling habit of focusing on family strife and controversy in an unglamorous way that feels a little art-house-y and “modern” to me. The earlier episodes, where drama at home mingled with the excitement of the birth of a nation, grabbed me more. It should be noted that Tom Wilkinson, an esteemed character actor, portrays Benjamin Franklin immaculately, and Stephen Dillane (never heard of him) is similarly wonderful as Thomas Jefferson. Both of them look so much like their characters that it’s creepy. David Morse, another fine actor, is wonderful as George Washington, although he isn’t quite the carbon copy that Wilkinson is to his role. Anyway, I highly recommend you give the series a shot sometime.

I suppose that’s about all for now. Talk to you again soon!